Cases Related to Malaysian Metabolic rate

[2013] MLJU 271

Kamalan a/l Shaik Mohd v Pendakwa Raya

EXCESSIVE COURT (PULAU PINANG)

EN ESTE MOMENTO ZAMANI RUBBISH BIN A RAHIM J

RAYUAN JENAYAH NO 41A-51-05/2012

18 March 2013

Ismail bin Mohamad (Tamil Salvan Tenappan with him) (T Tenappan & Co) for the appellant. Suhaimi bin Ibrahim (Charanjit Singh a/l Mahinder Singh with him) (Deputy Public Prosecutors) for the prosecution. YA Zamani Rubbish bin A Rahim J:

REASONS OF DECISION

[1] The appellant, a police sergeant (hereinafter referred to as " the accused" ) was an investigating police officer attached to Bukit Mertajam Law enforcement Station. Amongst his tasks, was to research commercial criminal offenses cases. [2] The accused was originally charged, at the instant of Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia, with two offences below s 10(a)(aa) of Anti Corruption Take action, 1997 and s 11(a) of of Anti File corruption error Act, 97 Anti Problem Act, 97 respectively in Butterworth Sessions Court which ended together with his acquittal. These are corruption cases. [3] The accused too was indicted with two charges at Bukit Mertajam Magistrate's Court docket under h 193 and s 217 (hereinafter called " s 193 and s 217 charges" ) respectively under the Penal Code. The h 193 and s 217 charges against the accused were at the immediate of the authorities and they go through as follows: 1) S 193 charge

Bahawa kamu pada 19. being unfaithful. 2004 jam 8. 00 pagi sehingga 22. on the lookout for. 2004 quickly pull 4 petang di Pejabat Pegawai Penyiasat Ibu Pejabat Polis Kota Seberang Bi?iukai Tengah, pada dalam Daerah Seberang Perai Tengah, di dalam Negeri Pulau Pinang, semasa jalankan siasatan bersabit Bukit Dalam Report 3671/2004, SPT/IP Number 2595/2004, kamu telah menyatakan di bawah S 119 Kanun Acara Jenayah iaitu catatan prosiding harian kes tersebut bahawa kamu (1) mengambil tangkapan bernama Cheah Liau Khuan KPT: 630809-07-5196 daripada lokap Balai Pastapas Kubang Semang pada twenty. 9. 2005 dan 21. 9. 2004 untuk dilakukan soal daya dan selepas itu dihantar balik ke lokap ini, (2) merakam percakapan pada bawah S 113 tangkapan Cheah Liau Khuan di 22. on the lookout for. 2004, (3) terima arahan pada 22. 9. 2004 daripada Pegawai Penyiasat Kanan IPD Seberang Perai Sedang C/lnsp Matn William Fernandez untuk dibebaskan tangkapan bernama Cheah Liau Khuan dengan jaminan stapas selama 2 minggu tetapi sebenarnya tangkapan bernama Cheah Liau Khuan tidak sempat dimasukkan ke dalam lokap Balai Polis Kubang Semang, yang mana kalian ketahui atau mempercayai sebagai keterangan palsu atau gak benar, maka dengan itu kamu telah melakukan kekeliruan yang bisa dihukum di bawah S i9000 193 Kanun Keseksaan. 2) S 217 charge

Bahawa kamu dalam 19. on the lookout for. 2004 quickly pull 12 sedang ah hingga 6 petang Pejabat Pegawai Penyiasat Ibu Pejabat Polis Daerah Seberang Perai Sedang, di dalam Daerah Seberang Perai Sedang, di dalam Negeri Pulau Pinang, semasa jalankan siasatan bersabit Bukit Tengah Survey 3671/2004, SPT/IP No . 2595/2004, kamu sudah didapati melepaskan tangkapan bernama Cheah Liau Khuan dengan tidak arahan sisi atasan kalian setelah mendapatkan reman pada bawah S 117 Kanun Acara Jenayah mulai 19. 9. 2005 sehingga twenty-five. 9. 2004 daripada Pendaftar Mahkamah Majistret / Sesyen Butterworth, dengan niat menyelamatkan tangkapan daripada tindakan hukum, maka dengan itu kamu telah melakukan kesalahan yang boleh didenda di bawah S 217 Kanun Keseksaan. [4] Having called for his defence on both the above charges, the accused was acquitted and discharged in regards to s 193 charge. The prosecution would not file any appeal from this acquittal for example s 193 charge. [5] However , the accused was found responsible and found guilty in respect of s 217 impose. He was sentenced to 6 a few months imprisonment from the date of conviction and a fine of RM3, 000. 00, in arrears 3 months imprisonment. Hence this appeal. [6] There are several argument raised by the accused in the petition of appeal, thus i located the accused's appeal is usually without value, save on one issue, particularly, the legal effect of an incomplete get across examination on a material experience for the prosecution. My spouse and i adjourned the hearing for further submissions simply by...

Essay on Organizational Habit Module 2

п»їM2. Circumstance Analysis: Employee Attitudes Module 2 1 ) Which of Schwartz's 15 values happen to be driving the behaviour of managers at Baignade & Organization, Home Lager…...

Read..
 garment Dissertation

garment Dissertation

1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 . 1 BACKGROUND Globalization has been the principal driver of change in supply chain buildings of the global…...

Read..

Safety Plan for Confined Space Essay

Management for Construction (EN-C007) Year: Consumption 3 2012-2013 Group MembersHK ID Number LAU KAI CHIZ 1720XX (X) SIU SAI WAIZ 2005XX (X) CHOI YUETZ…...

Read..

Taxonomy of Dr-Ntu in Singapore Composition

Abstract The Digital Database of Nanyang Technological College or university (DR-NTU) provides adopted a taxonomy together with the intention of facilitate the search and retrieval info. In addition…...

Read..
 Essay regarding Management

Essay regarding Management

PROJECT 01: SCK 4808 в—ЏDUE DATE: 10 MAY 2013 в—ЏUNIQUE AMOUNT: 763791 в—ЏMAXIMUM MARK: 90 в—ЏPERCENTAGE TO YEAR DRAW: 20% STUDENT NAME: CARMEN KOOPMAN…...

Read..

Proposed Marketplace Entry Method for Tesco - Indian Retail Food Market Dissertation

Sainsbury Plc Proposed Market Entrance Strategy - Indian Price tag Food Market History Britain's realtor mls database for meals is highly competitive and extremely complex.…...

Read..